Cool Youth Group Slogans

Super Salmon Good for you, is good for all Horses

Another issue that was talked about in the interview Zapatero yesterday was the support from banks. According to the Prime Minister, the aid was not free and actually be good for everyone because the borrowed money would be repaid with interest. Coldly analyzing Zapatero's words we see a small problem with this reasoning.

First, we consider that there are three "lots" of money in our society. The state has a certain amount of money, banks and other citizens have another:


The state lends money to banks. It does not free but in the time it does, the State ceases to have (temporarily) some money and the banks who are (temporarily) go to have it. For simplicity, assume that the state loses 100 euros to banks. At that time, the state has less 100 euros, 100 euros banks have more and people we like.


Now the banks fulfill their part of the deal and used the money they received from the State to grant loans, mortgages and stuff. When money leaves the bank, the State still $ 100 less than it had in the beginning, the bank has the same money and the people we have 100 euros more.


But, friend!, Not everything is so pretty. Loans should be returned. All the money that citizens receive from the bank have it back. If interest results in, say, 15 euros, when people return the money to the bank, the State continues to be $ 100 less than before, banks will have 115 euros more than the first and citizens will have less 15 euros.


Finally, as Zapatero has promised us, the banks return the money to the state. With interest. Say, 5 euros. So the end result, once the money has come to move and no one owes anything to anyone is that the state has more 5 euros, the bank has more 10 euros and 15 euros citizens have less .


Good for all, right?

Fastest Point & Shoot

Today posted on YouTube is expected Zapatero interview . Like the other questions the media will be serious, I ask this to me.

suffer it worth everything we're suffering from being in Europe? What are the benefits of belonging to Europe?

Question Neofile
(Málaga)

if today I remember that Spain is Europe's leading high-speed, which is a means of transport as environmentally positive, which benefits both the local economy, tourism, the high-speed network, including high-speed network that has Malaga, is partly financed with European funds.

José

Luis Rodríguez Zapatero Prime Minister

AVE

The network is actually funded by European Union funds. Specifically for the Cohesion Fund, an instrument purportedly designed, as they say to reduce social and economic disparities between citizens of the Union. Vale. Whatever.

What I do not see is the other. What of the economy. If we leaders in High Speed \u200b\u200band High Speed \u200b\u200bis as good (not "good" as good) for the economy, why do not we are leaders in economy?

Use Os Silvernitrate In Cervix

winner

Late last year I discovered, incidentally, schedules of trains between Madrid and Valladolid in 2007. At that time I wrote an entry on the "evolution" that had experienced these trains: In three years the price of the train had gone cheaper over 50% while increased travel time in fifteen minutes. I never know how you mounted the Renfe to announce this incredible "improvement" without being dropped their heads in shame.

What I have found it otherwise. Not nearly as interesting, but something flashy. These days Renfe is announcing that from day 29 will be a new train between Salamanca and Zaragoza. What Renfe not being advertised so much that the new train does not go there to complement the Talgo had before, but to replace it. And, of course, what silent as prostitutes is that replacing the Talgo train is a Middle Distance . That, yes, despite being a regional (perfect for travel six hours) will cost the same as the Talgo. That, for this is new!


But this, as everything has a reason. In 2009 Renfe spent 6,000 million euros to ensure you have " the modern train fleet in Europe . It will, perhaps, because we are the richest country in Europe. But of course, to have the most modern fleet is not enough to have new trains, we must get rid of the old. First of old old, those who lined up exceeded two miles long, waiting for you to buy someone who wants to have trains running and not breaking records. And now, those who remain. This week Renfe has begun to train with less scrap 20 years. For those who do not know, as the Minister of Development and rabble well, the shelf life of a train is around 40. scrapped trains have not served half of his life only to make room for more trains and little money to be with commissions is negligible. Pretender justified by propaganda against the old trains is repugnant. Doing it in the middle of a crisis, spending millions while cutting money where it really needed, just a name.